Nationwide
Updates
►
Competitiveness and market economy
It is
not an attempt to explain the issue in any depth, but it
will perhaps be worth taking a closer look at the term
“competitiveness’ in the global market. No denial of the
fact, that the masters of developing countries are IMF/World
Bank and WTO and now the nation sates are not in control of
global economy but they are just subject to their violent
competitive forces and they have to compete for having
capital. Clearly, third World countries are locked into a
vicious circle ever since the self administrated debts
billed to the World Bank and the IMF. All this was revolving
around in the name of ‘improving their competitiveness’ in
the global market or “short-term pain for long-term gain”.
(The News)
►
Where will money come from to finance
the new budget?
Concerns
about inadequate resources to plug the budget gap continue
to occupy our economic managers during the budget month -
June. There have already been two extensions to the date of
the budget announcement - from June 7 to June 10 and, more
recently, to June 11. While political pundits claim that the
one day delay is to ensure that the budget does not coincide
with the day of the lawyers' protest march, yet delays
coupled with last minute shuttle diplomacy by Prime Minister
Gilani seem to be a reflection of the yawning gap in the
budget. According to some media reports, the budgetary gap
is expected to be around Rs 0.75 trillion with total outlay
estimated at Rs 2 trillion and total revenue at Rs 1.25
trillion. (Business Recorder)
►
Difficult macroeconomic environment
for the budget
The U.N. World Food Program has warned that according
to its estimates nearly half of the country’s 160 million
people are at risk of running short of food due to rising
grain prices. The poverty impact of the surge in food prices
could be high and could wipe out years of gains in poverty
reduction in recent years. Another report Global Development
Finance 2008 contains horrible projections about the current
account deficit of around 7 to 8 percent in the next five
years. The situation on the fiscal front could not be
different because fiscal deficit is likely to remain well
above 5 percent of GDP. Another timely warning from experts
of international repute for the Oil-importing countries like
Pakistan which are already running substantial current
account deficits (The News)
►
Relocating development priorities
Budget
for forthcoming fiscal year is to be framed in quite
depressing macro-economic environment and in the midst of
rising expectations by the people at large who have suffered
a lot because of high inflation and other adverse economic
reasons. In such a situation, the government is to adopt a
few short, medium and long-term fiscal and administrative
measures and execute policies that have to be result
oriented for the public. In order to get the best results,
it is imperative to relocate priorities for economic growth
and development that should focus on well-being of people
and strengthen economy to withstand internal and external
shocks arising because of multiple factors. (The News)
►
State of the economy: a realistic
assessment
The
government has indicated its intention of broadening the tax
base, and rein-in expenditure for macro-economic stability
and has also indicated that it intends to diversify its
financial base and reduce its dependence on central bank
borrowings. The recently released Third Quarterly Report of
the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) for the fiscal year 2007-08
presents on analytic, objective assessment of performance of
the economy during July-March FY-08 and highlights the
challenges confronting it. It recommends appropriate
policies and measures for ensuring socially necessary growth
in an inhospitable international milieu. (The News)
►
Slapdash solutions to economic problems
Some of
the gravest economic issues inherited by the elected
government include inflation in general and food inflation
in particular, rising oil prices, rising poverty,
unemployment, energy deficit, current account deficit, and
deprivation related issues of rising crime and terror, to
name a few. While there is an attempt to solve them sooner
rather than later, some of the proposed remedies are more
symptomatic instead of a jab at the sources and causes. For
example, an IFI’s suggestion to withdraw subsidy on oil
prices to favourably affect fiscal deficit might temporarily
serve the purpose somewhat. (Dawn)
►
Wheat crisis: a liberal perspective
IN
Pakistan economic liberalism has been behind all economic
decisions except in the case of agricultural production.In
manufacturing, we have embraced post-quota world and in
services - banking, telecom, insurance, wholesale trade etc.
In recent years, the economic growth has been propelled by
the services, where the free market forces have been allowed
to work relatively independently. When the price of any
commodity rises, the profit margins of producers rise and in
an open economy, it attracts new producers. The entry of new
producers increases supply which ultimately brings down the
prices and the profit margins. (Dawn)
►
A paradigm shift in agriculture
Along
with an unsettled political situation, increasing acts of
violence perpetrated by extremist groups operating from the
country’s tribal areas and the quick unraveling of the model
of economic growth pursued by the administration of
President Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan has received another
sharp jolt to its economy. This was delivered by an
unprecedented increase in commodity prices. While the
increase in the price of oil has occurred over a relatively
long period of time, that of some agricultural commodities
was sudden and unexpected. In 2007, the price of wheat rose
77 and rice 16 per cent. (Dawn)
►
UN summit and global food crisis
The United Nations (UN) summit on global food crisis held in
Rome
could not come up with a communique as unfortunately none
could be agreed upon. The summit ended up in trading of
accusations between the crops for fuel supporters and crops
for human food protagonists. Nonetheless, the leaders
attending the summit did call for reducing trade barriers
and ending commodity export bans. The World Food Programme
has estimated that it will require $500 million on top of
what has already been pledged to fill the food gap. One
would hope that the donor countries would step in and not
only ensure that their pledges are translated into actual
money but also that the needs of the global poor are met.
(Business Recorder)