|
AS world
food prices continue to soar and developing countries’ struggle to
feed their hungry and angry populations, the European Union has
become entangled in yet another acrimonious internal debate on the
future of its heavily subsidised farm sector.
Significantly, the discussions, likely to last for several months,
could well have a negative impact on efforts to revitalise the
efforts of the World Trade Organisation to clinch a
much-sought-after deal on global trade liberalisation.
The EU quarrel pits France and Germany, the EU’s most powerful
nations, which want to safeguard — and reinforce — the bloc’s
controversial Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) against Britain which
is demanding a dismantling of CAP. The debate, coming only days
ahead of the Irish referendum on the EU reform treaty on June 12,
has assumed controversial political overtones, with many fearing
that influential Irish farmers, angered by attacks on CAP, will vote
against the EU treaty, plunging the bloc into another damaging
political crisis.
Asian governments, focused on their own food policies, must also pay
some attention to the EU wrangling over farm practices. For one,
given its protectionist bias based on high tariffs and quotas, the
death or survival of CAP will have an impact on future food exports
from developing countries. Also, as poor nations strive to put their
agriculture sector in order, it is worth spotlighting that despite
recent reforms, CAP continues to encourage an over-production of
food which, once it is dumped on world markets, damages the
interests of farmers in developing nations.
Even more significantly, any EU move to suspend further CAP reform
will slow down the current WTO attempt to further liberalise world
trade in agriculture goods, a key focus of the current Doha trade
round.
The coming weeks in Brussels look set to be dominated by the debate
over agriculture. Mariann Fischer Boel, the European farm
commissioner, will formally announce her proposals to overhaul CAP
on May 20 in the face of a Franco-German alliance to defend the
status quo against reform attempts.
Fischer Boel calls her package a ‘health check’ for CAP, rather than
a fully fledged reform. The proposals aim to trim subsidies to
farmers, divert more money to rural development, and get rid of a
range of market intervention measures, which, she says, should be
used only as a ‘genuine safety net’.
But even before the proposals have been announced, Horst Seehofer
and Michel Barnier, the German and French farm ministers, have
indicated their opposition to any radical changes to the EU’s farm
support system. Barnier’s recent remarks indicate strong support for
the EU’s farm subsidies and market-support mechanisms. The French
farm chief has even recommended that countries in Africa and Latin
America should adopt a version of CAP to curb the escalating
problems of food supply and price rises.
The developing world should draw inspiration from Europe and form
self-sufficient regional agricultural blocs funded with a
redirection of development aid, Barnier said, adding that he would
not allow Europe’s system of subsidies and barriers to trade to take
the blame for ‘disorder’ surrounding the commodities spike in prices
and associated unrest in some countries.
“What we are now witnessing in the world is the consequence of too
much free-market liberalism,” he said. “We can’t leave feeding
people to the mercy of the market. We need a public policy, a means
of intervention and stabilisation”. France wants to use its rotating
presidency of the EU, which starts in July, to kickstart a debate
about the future of CAP after 2013, when the current funding regime
runs out.
Germany’s Seehofer has sided with Barnier and argues that subsidies
should be sustained for European farmers and that China, India and
the US must adopt higher environmental and health standards if they
want to export food products to the EU.
Both Barnier and Seehofer are on tricky ground, however. Their calls
to toughen up food safety controls are likely to be disputed by the
WTO and could also prompt retaliation from trading partners. EU
efforts to block approval for genetically modified crop varieties,
for instance, are a major transatlantic trade irritant.
In stark contrast, Alistair Darling, the UK’s finance minister, has
urged EU finance ministers to support the dismantling of CAP because
it keeps EU food prices above world market levels. Darling also
wants to end direct payments to farmers and has denounced the fact
that the EU continues to apply very high import tariffs to many
agricultural commodities at a time of significant food price
inflation.
The chancellor has called on the European commission to give urgent
consideration to extending the suspension of import tariffs on
grains and to reduce or suspend import tariffs that apply to other
agricultural commodities.
EU states are also struggling to justify their efforts to promote
biofuels in the face of critics who say such policies are worsening
the global food crisis. Fischer Boel recently rejected allegations
that EU policies to promote biofuels — by a commitment to raise the
share of biofuels in transport from current levels of around two per
cent to 10 per cent by 2020 — are to blame for rising food prices.
“Those who see biofuels as the driving force behind recent food
price increases have overlooked not just one elephant standing right
in front of them, but two,” she said recently, adding that the
rising food demand and dietary shift towards meat in emerging
countries like China and India, and the bad weather that hit the EU,
US, Canada, Russia, Ukraine and Australia in 2006 and 2007, have
each had ‘an enormous impact on commodity markets’. Other
‘influences’ include increasing speculation on food commodities, she
said.
Her remarks came one day after Jeffrey Sachs, special advisor to the
United Nations secretary general, told members of the European
Parliament that EU and US policies to promote biofuels ought to be
rethought. “These programmes were understandable at a time of much
lower food prices and larger food stocks, but do not make sense now
in a global food scarcity condition,” he insisted.
Sachs said one third of the US maize crop in 2008 will be used to
fill petrol tanks — representing a ‘huge blow to the world food
supply’. But Fischer Boel insisted that the contribution of EU
biofuels policy to the current global food crisis is a mere ‘drop in
the ocean’.
The debate is likely to get fiercer during the year. No EU deal on
CAP reform is likely until at least November when France, by far the
largest beneficiary of EU farm subsidies, will be in charge of EU
policymaking.
Ref link:
http://www.dawn.com/2008/05/17/ed.htm#5 |
